Journal

Tagged: ""

April 20, 2020

Summer Residencies for Art Faculty

by Alexandra Sloan Friedman

The International Studio & Curatorial Program is New York’s most comprehensive international visual arts residency program. ISCP is perhaps best known for the nearly 75 international residents that come to New York each year to undertake residencies; however, ISCP has also hosted United States-based artists since the first years of the program. Residencies for U.S. artists are awarded through direct applications and partner sponsors, such as the Pollock-Krasner Foundation. In an effort to include more local artists and curators in the program, the Summer Residencies for Art Faculty was initiated in 2016.¹ 

Since 2017, ISCP has specifically reserved one of its 28 studios in the International Program for artists who teach at the university-level for a three-month residency period in the summer. While residents in the International Program are sponsored by ministries of culture,  foundations, galleries and other forms of private sponsors—primarily from their home countries—the artists in the Summer Art Faculty Program receive funding from their universities and colleges, typically with grants for research and development. The program has found many successes—it provides the time for artists teaching at the university level to undertake a residency, it continues to diversify ISCP’s program, and most importantly, it contributes to the development and advancement of the participating artists’ work. 

From the program’s conception through this past year, ISCP has hosted six summer residencies for art faculty, with artists including Heather Brammeier (who split her residency between two summers in 2018 and 2019, an option for any resident in the program), sponsored by Bradley University, Indiana and Big Picture Peoria; Susan Klein, sponsored by College of Charleston, South Carolina (ISCP, 2018); Susan Moore, sponsored by Indiana University, Indiana (ISCP, 2018); Suzanne Dittenber, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Asheville (ISCP, 2019); Julie Ann Nagle, sponsored by William Paterson University, New Jersey (ISCP, 2019); and Maria Zervos, sponsored by Wolf Inc. and The J.F. Costopoulos Foundation (ISCP 2017, 2020).

As is the case for many artists worldwide, studio space can be hard to come by, and the time for artists to participate in a residency program can be equally difficult to schedule. This is why ISCP works with art faculty around the U.S. to schedule residencies during summer breaks between semesters. As with many professions, being an artist or curator is a full-time commitment, not limited to the school year’s calendar. The ISCP art faculty residencies create the opportunity for artists to focus on their art practice and research in a more concentrated way, outside of teaching and administrative responsibilities, and with the support of their universities. 

Of the seven residents who have participated in ISCP through this particular route, many develop a new international network. Susan Klein stated that “she enjoyed the stimulation of working alongside talented international artists and felt supported and was able to develop work.” While Susan Moore felt “this intensive and inspiring time to devote to [her] art practice was truly amazing and life changing for [her] work and scholarship…because of my experiences at ISCP, my work as an artist and educator has never been stronger and more impactful.” 

¹Please note, International art faculty are also invited to apply.

June 18, 2020

Residents Zai Nomura and Sara Wallgren in Conversation

by Zai Nomura and Sara Wallgren

This conversation originated following an ISCP weekly online discussion that began in March 20, 2020 and that still continues each Friday. The question posed to residents was: “Do you believe that you can be inspired through online communication?”

Zai Nomura: My answer is “yes, it’s possible.”

Sara Wallgren: Do you think that you can become inspired through an online platform indefinitely, or is it limited to this exceptional period of time?

ZN: I think the internet has the potential to inspire me all the time. Since our last conversation, when we spoke about how hard it is to work in isolation, I began to research and reconsider how we use the internet (Zoom, Instagram, Google Hangout, etc.) to create new artwork. I realized that the internet is such a young material for art, and that not many artists “use” it in a very effective way.

SW: Yes, I guess you’re right. I also think that there is an interesting connection between what our inspiration is and how that is manifested in our work. So, since much of our interactive “art-lives” have moved online these days, it makes sense that this becomes our new platform for producing work. However, I can’t help missing that which is unplanned, such as an “unplanned studio visit” from a friend who visits the studio for a coffee and happens to have a comment about a work in progress.

ZN: Right.

SW: I don’t see how I can substitute this situation via digital media.

ZN: That is very interesting. “Unplanned” is also a weaknesses of AI.

SW: Yes. Even the unplanned in AI is planned.

ZN: How about if a human chance-encounter could happen through the internet-medium? The ISCP Google Hangout conversations are planned.

SW: Sure! Now I am thinking about what is provided via these new forms of communication. I guess that by sitting in front of the computer, we can control the direction of the person’s gaze who we are speaking with, as long as there is only one camera. But if there were multiple cameras as part of every conversation, controlled by the person outside of the room, then control would be lost. (Resembling having someone in the room looking around.)  A limited spontaneity? And a bit creepy perhaps.

ZN: Yes, it is. Even though the system looks like it’s created for “multiple communications,” only one person talks to another person, and other people can’t get into the conversation in a good way. However, how about if we could do something to the single camera directly, not in terms of hacking or digitally but more like attaching a paper or picture? Then, we could change the actual room that is seen online, like room decoration.

SW: Ah this is interesting. Not using the online platform for a digital medium but an analog medium?

ZN: Yes. Then people in Zoom will be surprised and feel very odd.

SW: Haha, yes.

ZN: That can be one idea about how to criticize the internet as an art material. If we take a step back from Zoom in order to reconsider or reconstruct it, then we could kind of get over the internet. That is why I said that the internet is still a young material.

SW: This makes me think about how these new uses of the internet might not only become a development of internet-based art, but also performance! In Zoom or Google Hangout, since it’s a bit more intimate—and at the same time it is not intimate—everyone has the same distance from the “artwork.” In this scenario, isn’t everyone on the call a participant in a time-based artwork?

ZN: That is a very cool perspective, I agree. I think a time-based process is one way to deconstruct the internet, another way can be materialization.

SW: I’m looking forward to seeing new art emerging in the next couple of months and years. It will be interesting to see how artists respond to these new conditions, the internet and inspiration.

ZN: Yes, this is kind of the same as the movie “Planet of the Apes”.

SW: Haha, yes!

ZN: This is a new tool for us.

Journal

Tagged: ""